Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in older patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The global phase 3 NAPOLI -1 trial of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit from using liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) after treatment with gemcitabine (GEM) compared to 5-FU/LV alone. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in older patients are not well studied. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study to compare the therapeutic efficacy of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between older and younger patients with cutoff ages of 70 and 75 years, respectively. We included patients with a prior history of one or more GEM-based regimens for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC and were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients, 54 (47.0%) and 24 (20.9%) were aged ≥ 70 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort were 8.5 and 3.6 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS hazard ratios using age cutoffs of 70 (P = 0.90 and 0.99, respectively) and 75 (P = 0.90 and 0.76, respectively) years. Additionally, no significant differences were found in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between patients aged ≥ 70 and < 70 years or those aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Other than hematological toxicity, no trAEs higher than Grade 4 were observed in either age group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC are not significantly different for those aged ≥ 70 years compared to younger patients.

Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

Background and Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is widely used in the management of biliary obstructions; however, literature on guidewire manipulation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the utility and optimal conditions of the loop technique for guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2015 and January 2022 were included in this study. Patient characteristics and procedural details were retrospectively analyzed. Guidewire manipulations were classified as conventional technique or loop technique, based on the shape of the guidewire tip. Results: A total of 52 patients (Median age: 73 years, 38 male and 14 female) underwent EUS-HGS. The median guidewire insertion time was 49 s and the median overall procedure time was 20.5 min. The initial guidewire direction was toward the peripheral side in 23 patients (44%). Technical success rate of the EUS-HGS was 100%. Twenty patients (38%) underwent the procedure using the loop technique and 32 (62%) with the conventional technique. In the logistic regression analysis, an angle between the bile duct and needle of >70° was independently associated with use of the loop technique (OR 9.84; 95% CI: 2.24-43.13; P <0.01). Conclusion: This study revealed the utility of the loop technique in EUS-HGS. This technique is recommended if the bile duct is punctured at an angle >70°.

FOLFOX regimen after failure of fluorouracil and leucovorin plus nanoliposomal-irinotecan therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil, leucovorin (5FU/LV), and nanoliposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) combination therapy has been established as the second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) is often used as a subsequent treatment, although its efficacy and safety are yet to be fully elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study that enrolled 43 patients who received FOLFOX after failure of gemcitabine-based regimen followed by 5FU/LV + nal-IRI therapy between October 2020 and January 2022. FOLFOX therapy consisted of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), levo-leucovorin calcium (200 mg/m2) and 5-FU (2400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks per cycle. Overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: At the median follow-up time of 3.9 months in all patients, the median overall survival and progression-free survival were 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-4.8) and 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.0-1.5), respectively. Response and disease control rates were 0 and 25.6%, respectively. The most common adverse event was anaemia in all grades followed by anorexia; the incidence of anorexia and grades 3 and 4 was 21 and 4.7%, respectively. Notably, grades 3-4 peripheral sensory neuropathy was not observed. Multivariable analysis revealed that a C-reactive protein (CRP) level of > 1.0 mg/dL was a poor prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival: hazard ratios were 2.037 (95% CI, 1.010-4.107; p = 0.047) and 2.471 (95% CI, 1.063-5.745; p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION: FOLFOX as a subsequent treatment after failure of second-line treatment with 5FU/LV + nal-IRI is tolerable, although its efficacy is limited, particularly in patients with high CRP levels.

Prognostic significance of sarcopenia as determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: A retrospective study.

Sarcopenia often affects patients with various types of cancer, and has been reported to affect patient prognosis and therapeutic effects. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the relationship between gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy (GnP) and sarcopenia in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The present study analyzed the relationship between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, disease control rate, adverse events (AEs) and sarcopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with GnP. A total of 121 consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who received GnP as first-line chemotherapy between January 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. GnP consisted of 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel, which were administered on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated using bioimpedance analysis (BIA) as an index of sarcopenia prior to GnP. The patients were divided into sarcopenia (n=41) and non-sarcopenia (n=80) groups using cutoff values of 8.87 and 6.42 kg/m2 for male and female patients, respectively. The sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups had a median OS of 8.1 and 13.9 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.20], and a median PFS of 4.3 and 6.3 months, respectively (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.42-0.95). The response and disease controls rate were not statistically different between the groups (20 vs. 32%, P=0.20; 81 vs. 80%, P=1.0). In addition, comparison of common grade 3 and 4 AEs between the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that SMI obtained by BIA may be a predictor of treatment response and prognosis in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who undergo GnP.

Novel clip device for prevention of bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy.

Objectives: Recently, a novel clip device, SureClip® (Micro-Tech Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China), has been developed, which improved rotation and reopening performance. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the SureClip® in prophylactic closure of the mucosal break after endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for ampullary neoplasm. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients who underwent EP for ampullary neoplasms between October 2009 and March 2020. Prophylactic closure after resection was performed using the conventional clip between 2014 and 2018, and with the SureClip® after 2019. The baseline characteristics, techniques, outcomes, and complications of EP were analyzed. Results: The median age of the patients (25 males and 15 females) was 70 years. The en block resection rate was 82.5% and the curative resection rate was 80.0%. Histologically, 11 (27.5%) patients had malignancy. Prophylactic closure was performed in 29 (72.5%) patients (17 conventional clips, 12 SureClip®). Complications occurred in 18 (45.0%) patients, including postprocedure bleeding in 9 (22.5%) patients. However, no postprocedure bleeding was observed in the patients who received prophylactic closure using the SureClip® (p = 0.038). All other factors were not significantly correlated with postprocedure bleeding. The duration of hospital stay after EP was significantly shorter in patients treated with the SureClip® compared to those treated with a conventional clip or without clips (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the present study, prophylactic clipping of the mucosal break using the SureClip® was effective in preventing bleeding after EP.

Multiple-line Chemotherapy for a Patient with Unresectable Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm of the Pancreas.

A 74-year-old woman with a cyst in her pancreatic tail was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography confirmed a large cystic lesion with irregular wall thickening, abdominal lymph node swelling, and ascites. We diagnosed her with an unresectable mucinous cystic neoplasm, since ascites cytology revealed adenocarcinoma. The patient received chemotherapy up to the fifth line for 55.2 months. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and modified FOLFIRINOX achieved a partial response with a progression-free survival time of 12.1 and 20.4 months, respectively. The overall survival time from the beginning of first-line chemotherapy was 69.4 months.

Clinical outcome of a highly flexible duodenal stent for gastric outlet obstruction: A multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic duodenal stenting for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been widespread; however, clinical trials evaluating the structures of duodenal stents are lacking. Thus, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of a highly flexible duodenal stent for GOO patients. METHODS: A prospective study of duodenal stenting for GOO patients from five hospitals between August 2017 and August 2018 was performed. WallFlex Duodenal Soft were used in all procedures. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as an improvement in the GOO scoring system. RESULTS: The study enrolled 31 patients (12 women, 19 men) with GOO, with a median age of 70 (range 52-90) years. Primary diseases were pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, biliary tract cancer, and others in 14, 10, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. The technical success rate was 97%, and the clinical success rate was 87%. Simultaneous biliary drainage was performed in 19% of patients. Adverse events occurred in three patients. Chemotherapy was given in 41% of clinically successful cases, and the median overall survival time after stent placement was 82 days (range, 30-341 days), and. Stent dysfunction occurred in 30% of clinically successful cases (stent ingrowth in seven and stent overgrowth in one patient). The median time to stent dysfunction was 157 days (range, 11-183 days). Six patients were treated with additional stent placement after dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Placement of a highly flexible duodenal stent is an effective and safe treatment for patients with GOO (UMIN-CTR 000028783).

A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Elderly Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the lesser known therapeutic benefit, particularly safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) treatment in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled advanced pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years who received GnP as first-line treatment between December 2014 and December 2016. We assessed survival, adverse events, and early treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 116 patients (median age, 77 [range, 75-84] years). The overall survival and progression-free survival were 21.8 and 12.1 months in patients with locally advanced cancer and 13.3 and 5.9 months, in patients with metastasis, respectively. The response and disease control rates were 31% and 81%, respectively. Within the first 2 months of treatment, grade 4 hematological and grade 3-4 nonhematological toxicities occurred in 10 and 23 patients, respectively. Early discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 12 patients; the associated risk factors were age ≥80 years (odds ratio, 9.43) and serum albumin level <3.5 g/dL (odds ratio, 5.12). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients aged ≥75 years, GnP showed acceptable toxicities and effectiveness. However, patients aged ≥80 years and those with serum albumin levels <3.5 g/dL should be carefully assessed for treatment eligibility.

Quantitative monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

According to cancer genome sequences, more than 90% of cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harbor active KRAS mutations. Digital PCR (dPCR) enables accurate detection and quantification of rare mutations. We assessed the dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) in patients with advanced PDAC undergoing chemotherapy using dPCR. KRAS G12/13 mutation was assayed by dPCR in 47 paired tissue- and ct-DNA samples. The 21 patients were subjected to quantitative ct-DNA monitoring at 4 to 8-week intervals during chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was detected in 45 of those 47 patients using tissue DNA. In the KRAS mutation-negative cases, next-generation sequencing revealed KRAS Q61K and NRAS Q61R mutations. KRAS mutation was detected in 23/45 cases using ct-DNA (liver or lung metastasis, 18/19; mutation allele frequency [MAF], 0.1%-31.7%; peritoneal metastasis, 3/9 [0.1%], locally advanced, 2/17 [0.1%-0.2%]). In the ct-DNA monitoring, the MAF value changed in concordance with the disease state. In the 6 locally advanced cases, KRAS mutation appeared concurrently with liver metastasis. Among the 6 cases with liver metastasis, KRAS mutation disappeared during the duration of stable disease or a partial response, and reappeared at the time of progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was longer in cases in which KRAS mutation disappeared after an initial course of chemotherapy than in those in which it was continuously detected (248.5 vs 50 days, P < .001). Therefore, ct-DNA monitoring enables continuous assessment of disease state and could have prognostic utility during chemotherapy.

Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for a metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient undergoing hemodialysis.

In cancer patients, impairment of kidney function is not uncommon. Recently, the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients has been reported, however, there is no recommendation for dose and administration to patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). A 66-year-old man began receiving HD for chronic renal failure 4 years previously. He suffered from diarrhea, back pain, and loss of appetite, and his weight gradually decreased. Abdominal dynamic computed tomography showed a 45-mm hypodense mass in the pancreatic body and a 30-mm hypodense mass in the liver. The patient was diagnosed with metastatic PDAC. He started combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel without dose modification. He developed pneumonia and neutropenia in the first and second courses, so we modified to a 60% dose of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel on day 1 every 2 weeks. After dose modification, he continued combination chemotherapy for over 7 months without severe adverse events or tumor progression. Combination chemotherapy using gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel was effective in a PDAC patient undergoing HD. While it is possible to originally administer these drugs with no dose modification, early dose modification was needed for our patient because of severe adverse events.

Predictive value of ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, and glutathione S-Transferase Pi expression for the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

The platinum-based chemotherapy regimen FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is currently used as a standard treatment for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. FOLFIRINOX is associated with severe toxicities, including neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and anorexia; however, there are currently no reliable biomarkers to predict its efficacy and safety. Several studies of patients with various cancers have shown that tumor expression of excision repair cross-complementing (ERCC) proteins and glutathione S-transferase Pi (GSTPi) correlates with the response to platinum-based chemotherapies. Therefore, in this study, we examined the associations between expression of ERCC proteins and GSTPi and the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in 34 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, and GSTPi expression were examined by immunohistochemical staining of tumor specimens and the results were correlated with overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, disease control rate, and the frequency of grade 3-4 neutropenia and non-hematologic toxicities. We found that ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, and GSTPi were expressed in tumor samples from 64%, 24%, 18%, and 64% of patients, respectively. Notably, there were no statistically significant associations between the expression pattern of any of the proteins and either the clinical outcomes or the frequency of grade 3-4 neutropenia or grade 3-4 anorexia. Collectively, these data indicate that tumor expression of ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, and GSTPi does not predict the safety or efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in patients with pancreatic cancer.